Toyota Mini Van Rollover Accident – New York Woman Dies in Roll-Over Accident on GWB – johnson newspaper corporationMarch 18, 2021
Earlier today another Toyota mini-van rolled over several times on the George Washington Bridge (GWB) causing the death of the female driver, Patricia Salcedo, 32, of New York City. Accident investigators have not yet determined what caused the Toyota mini-van to flip; however, according to officials, Ms Salcedo was heading westbound on the bridge in the Toyota minivan when it flipped.
Per a recent study, over 10,000 people are killed yearly as occupants in light vehicle rollovers, including 8,345 killed in single-vehicle rollovers. Eighty percent of the people who died in single-vehicle rollovers were not using a seat belt, and 64 percent were ejected from the vehicle (including 53 percent who were completely ejected). The study further shows that 55 percent of light vehicle occupant fatalities in single-vehicle crashes involved rollover. The proportion differs greatly by vehicle type: 46 percent of passenger car occupant fatalities in single-vehicle crashes involved rollover, compared to 63 percent for pickup trucks, 60 percent for vans, and 78 percent for sport utility vehicles (SUVs).
According to a New York vehicle rollover accident attorney, SUVs and minivans are perhaps the most unsafe vehicles on the road and they are prone to roll over because of their higher center of gravity and narrow wheelbase.
New York Bus Accident Lawyer – New York State Attempts to Reduce Bus Accidents – johnson newspaper corporation
Lately bus accident incidents have been making the newspaper headlines and main story on television. Not that bus accidents are just starting to happen; however, the deadly New York tour bus crash on I-95 in the Bronx brought the issue to a national audience. As you may remember, said accident occurred on March 12, 2011 when a tour bus carrying 31 passengers on their way from a casino outing at Mohegan Sun in Connecticut crashed killing 15 passengers and severely injuring several others.
In wake of the spotlight on tour bus accidents in New York State and around the country, NY Governor Cuomo ordered random roadside checks of buses on New York roads. Per the Governor, “…bus drivers who don’t follow the rules as well as buses that are unsafe must be taken off the road so that New Yorkers can have confidence in the safety of the public transportation system.” The crackdown by the Governor led to numerous bus drivers and buses being taken off New York roads. One would think that with the increased press on the Bronx bus tragedy, operators would heighten their own inspection of their buses and make sure that drivers satisfied all the necessary requirements to operate these buses. However, as the random roadside checks found, defective buses were still in operation. Plus drivers without the proper licenses were still operating these buses. For example, one such random check found a bus from Pennsylvania that had bad brakes, leak in the brake hose among other safety violations which could have resulted in another deadly crash. Incredibly, the bus driver did not have a commercial license which is required to operate such a vehicle.
In additional to random checks by police and department of transportation inspectors, New York State has taken an additional step to reduce to number of bus accidents on New York roads and highways. The NY state senate recently passed a bill that requires criminal background checks, including fingerprinting, on all newly hired bus drivers. Bus drivers who currently have a commercial license would need to submit to the criminal background check once their commercial licenses comes up for renewal. This requirement is already in force for school bus drivers. Per the bill’s sponsor, “bus drivers literally hold their passengers’ lives and safety in their hands. Those passengers should be able to trust that the driver is qualified to handle that responsibility.” According to an experienced New York bus accident lawyer, the new law should make New York roads safer and reduce bus accidents which may cause serious bodily injury and even death.
Monetary Limits On Medical Malpractice Awards in New York State – johnson newspaper corporation
One of the latest debates being held in Albany New York is whether there should be monetary limits on pain and suffering awards for medical malpractice lawsuits in New York State. What if someone who is dear to you is the victim and whose health and life is destroyed by the negligence or misconduct of a hospital’s medical staff or doctor? What if it is you? Does it make you uneasy that the legislature in Albany is presently debating a bill in support of an award of $250,000.00 as being the maximum compensation for pain and suffering in medical malpractice cases? Is it right to set a limit on pain and suffering damages? Who wins and who loses?
The possibility of this major change is the result of Governor Cuomo’s Medicaid Redesign Team whose task is to recommend savings practices and make changes in existing programs in order to meet the guidelines for the Governor’ Medicaid expenditures cutoff amount of about $15.1 billion. Supporters of the $250,000.00 cap on medical malpractice pain and suffering claims express enthusiasm over being able to save a considerable amount on malpractice insurance premiums and of course reduce Medicaid related expenses. Naturally, most New York plaintiff medical malpractice attorneys are against the proposed changes to the law.
Another opinion on the matter illustrates how a medical institution could be instrumental in the mitigation of medical malpractice lawsuits by creating a system that protects the patients, hospital administration and medical team. A supporter of such a system is Dr. Amos Grunebaum who touts praise for the initiative taken by New York Presbyterian Hospital/Weill Cornell in their implementation of an extensive obstetrics safety program. Details of the program implemented by said hospital are found in Dr. Amos Grunebaum’s report published in the February issue of the American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology. Dr. Grunebaum’s point of view places emphasis on said hospital’s proactive measures taken to provide medical staff with a protocol aiming to saves lives in life threatening hospital situations, set a foundation for the safety of patients, create accountability and medical team cohesiveness by replacing written records with a computerized patient care log, and to employ a solution that addresses the precarious nature of a doctor’s excessive work hours and how it may adversely affect patient care. While those measures may require the hospital to incur an expense to instate the procedures and hire necessary staff the long term benefits outweigh the initial cost.
Finally another unintended outcome of this proposal if it is effectuated in New York State’s legislature is the further denigration of health care provided by underfunded and overextended medical facilities. According to a New York medical malpractice lawyer, “if hospitals and doctors provide services with the knowledge that their liability for pain and suffering is capped at $250,000.00 then it might create an environment where procedures are not handled with the utmost care thereby endangering the quality of treatment and resulting in irreparable and irrecoverable medical injury to the most defenseless citizens.”